Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:08:03 +0000 (UTC) From: Marius Strobl <marius@FreeBSD.org> To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-8@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit: r205902 - stable/8/lib/libc/sparc64/fpu Message-ID: <201003301908.o2UJ83qF067464@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Author: marius Date: Tue Mar 30 19:08:02 2010 New Revision: 205902 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/205902 Log: MFC: r205397 - While SPARC V9 allows tininess to be detected either before or after rounding (impl. dep. #55), the SPARC JPS1 responsible for SPARC64 and UltraSPARC processors defines that in all cases tinyness is detected before rounding, therefore rounding up to the smallest normalised number should set the underflow flag. - If an infinite result is rounded down, the result should have an exponent 1 less than the value for infinity. PR: 144900 Submitted by: Peter Jeremy Modified: stable/8/lib/libc/sparc64/fpu/fpu_implode.c Directory Properties: stable/8/lib/libc/ (props changed) stable/8/lib/libc/stdtime/ (props changed) Modified: stable/8/lib/libc/sparc64/fpu/fpu_implode.c ============================================================================== --- stable/8/lib/libc/sparc64/fpu/fpu_implode.c Tue Mar 30 19:08:01 2010 (r205901) +++ stable/8/lib/libc/sparc64/fpu/fpu_implode.c Tue Mar 30 19:08:02 2010 (r205902) @@ -329,8 +329,9 @@ __fpu_ftos(fe, fp) * right to introduce leading zeroes. Rounding then acts * differently for normals and subnormals: the largest subnormal * may round to the smallest normal (1.0 x 2^minexp), or may - * remain subnormal. In the latter case, signal an underflow - * if the result was inexact or if underflow traps are enabled. + * remain subnormal. A number that is subnormal before rounding + * will signal an underflow if the result is inexact or if underflow + * traps are enabled. * * Rounding a normal, on the other hand, always produces another * normal (although either way the result might be too big for @@ -345,8 +346,10 @@ __fpu_ftos(fe, fp) if ((exp = fp->fp_exp + SNG_EXP_BIAS) <= 0) { /* subnormal */ /* -NG for g,r; -SNG_FRACBITS-exp for fraction */ (void) __fpu_shr(fp, FP_NMANT - FP_NG - SNG_FRACBITS - exp); - if (fpround(fe, fp) && fp->fp_mant[3] == SNG_EXP(1)) + if (fpround(fe, fp) && fp->fp_mant[3] == SNG_EXP(1)) { + fe->fe_cx |= FSR_UF; return (sign | SNG_EXP(1) | 0); + } if ((fe->fe_cx & FSR_NX) || (fe->fe_fsr & (FSR_UF << FSR_TEM_SHIFT))) fe->fe_cx |= FSR_UF; @@ -407,6 +410,7 @@ zero: res[1] = 0; if ((exp = fp->fp_exp + DBL_EXP_BIAS) <= 0) { (void) __fpu_shr(fp, FP_NMANT - FP_NG - DBL_FRACBITS - exp); if (fpround(fe, fp) && fp->fp_mant[2] == DBL_EXP(1)) { + fe->fe_cx |= FSR_UF; res[1] = 0; return (sign | DBL_EXP(1) | 0); } @@ -426,7 +430,7 @@ zero: res[1] = 0; return (sign | DBL_EXP(DBL_EXP_INFNAN) | 0); } res[1] = ~0; - return (sign | DBL_EXP(DBL_EXP_INFNAN) | DBL_MASK); + return (sign | DBL_EXP(DBL_EXP_INFNAN - 1) | DBL_MASK); } done: res[1] = fp->fp_mant[3]; @@ -468,6 +472,7 @@ zero: res[1] = res[2] = res[3] = 0; if ((exp = fp->fp_exp + EXT_EXP_BIAS) <= 0) { (void) __fpu_shr(fp, FP_NMANT - FP_NG - EXT_FRACBITS - exp); if (fpround(fe, fp) && fp->fp_mant[0] == EXT_EXP(1)) { + fe->fe_cx |= FSR_UF; res[1] = res[2] = res[3] = 0; return (sign | EXT_EXP(1) | 0); } @@ -487,7 +492,7 @@ zero: res[1] = res[2] = res[3] = 0; return (sign | EXT_EXP(EXT_EXP_INFNAN) | 0); } res[1] = res[2] = res[3] = ~0; - return (sign | EXT_EXP(EXT_EXP_INFNAN) | EXT_MASK); + return (sign | EXT_EXP(EXT_EXP_INFNAN - 1) | EXT_MASK); } done: res[1] = fp->fp_mant[1];
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201003301908.o2UJ83qF067464>