Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:16:35 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Hugo Meiland <hugo@chem.leidenuniv.nl> Cc: freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: net/openafs-server and/or kernel module (7.0-STABLE-i386) Message-ID: <96873100@bs1.sp34.ru> In-Reply-To: <485811F9.5030401@chem.leidenuniv.nl> (Hugo Meiland's message of "Tue\, 17 Jun 2008 21\:35\:21 %2B0200") References: <62956155@bs1.sp34.ru> <485811F9.5030401@chem.leidenuniv.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 21:35:21 +0200 Hugo Meiland wrote: > > So the question is: should a kernel module from net/arla (or something > > else) be used? > normally you would like to have a client running on the system from > which you want to control the server; thus have a arla client running > on the server if you are building a single system setup.... It shouldn't be a single system (if it fits our needs). But this system is just a first one to experiment with. > another option is to control the server from a different machine with > only the client software (often the arla client and some utils from > the openafs-server package, since they have implemented all options to > actually control the server); this last option is not very easy to set > up if you do not have at least one server up-and-running.... Seems that I understand the case. > Hope this helpes... Sure, thanks! WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?96873100>