Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 13:06:12 +1000 From: grenville armitage <garmitage@swin.edu.au> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BBR Congestion Control Algorithm Message-ID: <57EDD6A4.5080007@swin.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <CAOp4FwRMG6R7UL7r1k5tWHj%2B=5sYYAP_G_jpDmyQsiz-De_vXw@mail.gmail.com> References: <AA8301AC-79B0-46AE-876A-2BFEEB0F9306@FreeBSD.org> <CAOp4FwRMG6R7UL7r1k5tWHj%2B=5sYYAP_G_jpDmyQsiz-De_vXw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 09/20/2016 21:25, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:
[...]
> A lot of groundwork needs to be done I suppose. For example,
> implementing high-resolution timers that would allow the FreeBSD
> network stack to implement BQL, and other necessary infrastructure in
> order for fq_codel/CAKE to work as well as on Linux.
I'd be interested in seeing experimental results that illustrate the limits or broken/edge cases you allude to in FreeBSD's current dummynet/ipfw-based FQ-CoDel.
cheers,
gja
>
> Perhaps this might be something that the FreeBSD foundation could look into ?
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57EDD6A4.5080007>