Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Jun 2015 16:49:59 +0300
From:      Ivan Klymenko <fidaj@ukr.net>
To:        David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Error building x11/nvidia-driver kernel module @r284408
Message-ID:  <20150615164959.617849bb@nonamehost.local>
In-Reply-To: <20150615133412.GJ1114@albert.catwhisker.org>
References:  <20150615133412.GJ1114@albert.catwhisker.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mon, 15 Jun 2015 06:34:12 -0700
David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=
=D0=B2:

> Now that "vanilla" head @284408 builds (& boots):
>=20
> FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT
> #1751  r284408M/284408:1100077: Mon Jun 15 05:51:00 PDT 2015
> root@freebeast.catwhisker.org:/common/S3/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
> amd64
>=20
> I find that for my laptop, I encounter an error while trying to build
> the x11/nvidia-driver kernel module (courtesy of /etc/src.conf:
>=20
> Please note that the (similar) refreshes for stable/10 (@r284404)
> had no problems; I have typescripts of them accessible (but I haven't
> put'them up on the Web server, as they're pretty boring).
>=20
> Perhaps some changes need to be made for (some?) ports to adjust for
> recent make & mk changes in head?
>=20
> I note that in the stable/10 case,
> the .../obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY/common/ports/x11/nvidia-driver/work/NVIDIA=
-FreeBSD-x86_64-346.47/src/machine
> "file" is a symlink to /usr/src/sys/amd64/include -- and that it
> doesn't exist in the i386 case (and that doesn't appear to be a
> problem).
>=20
> Peace,
> david

The situation|problem is similar with emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod
I think that many of the modules from the port tree will not be
building, but personally tested only emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150615164959.617849bb>