Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 17:35:16 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vm_mtx Message-ID: <59442.988126516@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 24 Apr 2001 11:27:24 EDT." <200104241527.LAA95978@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200104241527.LAA95978@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Garrett Wollman write s: ><<On Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:51:31 -0700, Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> said: > >> You can find the work I've done so far to make a giant vm mutex >> here: > >The Mach code we originally inherited was supposed to already by >multiprocessor safe. Did we manage to eliminate that capability? I'm sure you are fully aware of the implications of the strategically placed "supposed" in your own sentence. I have never heard anybody get Mach code multithreaded yet. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?59442.988126516>