Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 17:43:09 +0000 From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> To: Bob Van Valzah <BVanValz@tibco.com> Cc: FreeBSD-Net@FreeBSD.Org Subject: Re: PIM IPv4 user-level process Message-ID: <20040201174309.GH705@saboteur.dek.spc.org> In-Reply-To: <1075504819.83564.133.camel@NewStorm.War.Tibco.Com> References: <1075477392.83564.4.camel@NewStorm.War.Tibco.Com> <20040130164551.GE732@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <1075504819.83564.133.camel@NewStorm.War.Tibco.Com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 05:20:19PM -0600, Bob Van Valzah wrote: > A port of the whole xorp world might be a better target than just the > pim part. That wouldn't take much since it compiled easily. But it is > a whopper--nearly 1 GB required to build. XORP would be good as a separate port, but for PIM alone, the USC code might be a better starting point. I think XORP has a much wider scope; considering it's an alternative to Quagga et al. BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040201174309.GH705>