Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 01:09:43 +0530 From: Rajneesh Shetty <shettyrn22@gmail.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Microsoft Paint & NXP Semiconductors Message-ID: <CAJSOB_BLUkcFPPhv8UvyrK_0nDkM377mUrrU8sSdYyyqf6p87w@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
*To whom it may concern* *I found your group when one of your online subscribers had a problem in the BSD Group. Although I did not react to his protests, I would like you to know, that I am sympathetic to his concerns. I am however unable to locate his email ID.* *The purpose of this email is to let you know that I would like to assist your GROUP with two software programs written by myself with the assistance of my friends from University between 1989-1995. The "i squared C", bus architecture is a proprietary architecture to NXP Semiconductors, an offshoot of Phillips, Holland. We wrote a non-volatile program for DC Loads and a Microsoft solution called "PC Paint=E2=80=9D. * *Trust your clients & team mates have not been disappointed by our efforts. I have no hesitation in being grateful to Microsoft Corporation, Intel Corporation and AMD (Radeon) after all these years of their incessant efforts to keep these technologies alive. * *Any suggestions you may have with regards to contributing to efforts already made would be appreciated here.* *Regards,* *Rajneesh * Tel : (+91) 8711 9653 19 http://www.i2c-bus.org/i2c-bus/ http://www.telos.info/download/i2c-studioframework/ Weblog : www.rns-thoughts.blogspot.com On 29 June 2016 at 17:30, <freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org> wrote: > Send freebsd-hackers mailing list submissions to > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > freebsd-hackers-owner@freebsd.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of freebsd-hackers digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: The small installations network filesystem and users. > (Julian Elischer) > 2. Re: The small installations network filesystem and users. > (Wojciech Puchar) > 3. Re: The small installations network filesystem and users. > (Wojciech Puchar) > 4. Re: The small installations network filesystem and users. > (Eduardo Morras) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 21:04:45 +0800 > From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> > To: Gerrit K?hn <gerrit.kuehn@aei.mpg.de>, Daniel Eischen > <deischen@freebsd.org> > Cc: freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers > <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> > Subject: Re: The small installations network filesystem and users. > Message-ID: <761f82d3-ebe9-2cba-9499-049dafbc98df@freebsd.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dwindows-1252; format=3Dflowed > > On 21/06/2016 1:56 PM, Gerrit K?hn wrote: > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 22:00:31 -0400 (EDT) Daniel Eischen > > <deischen@freebsd.org> wrote about Re: The small installations network > > filesystem and users.: > > > > DE> We should support LDAP client out of the box, in base. What > > DE> sucks now is that we need 3 packages (plus their dependencies) > > DE> and multiple config files for ldap: > > DE> > > DE> pam_ldap > > DE> nss_ldap > > DE> openldap-client > > > > I only have to install/config ldap-clients every now and then, but I > would > > also strongly favour a more "integrated" setup (if that requires having > it > > in base is a different question, though). A few weeks ago I used > > nss-pam-ldapd instead of pam_ldap and nss_ldap for the first time, and = it > > appeared to work with a bit less of a hassle for me (otoh, I don't do a= ny > > funky things here, I just need a replacement for what we did with NIS > > something like 20 years ago). > > +1 > I just had to reinstall certs for my server. which means copying > certs to several places (in a default config) > sendmail and syrus ad openssl (base) all look in different places. you > COULD make them all look in the same place > but that requires undersanding what is going on and not just cribbing > the config file off the net somewhere. > > I think ports and pkg are fine, but we need to have some more thought > put into how they all go together. > > > > > > > cu > > Gerrit > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:23:22 +0200 (CEST) > From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net> > To: Chris Watson <bsdunix44@gmail.com> > Cc: Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com>, freebsd-fs > <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers > <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> > Subject: Re: The small installations network filesystem and users. > Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1606281723010.8870@laptop.wojtek.intra> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUS-ASCII; format=3Dflowed > > > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2016, Chris Watson wrote: > > > I'm glad you brought this up. I wanted to but I've heard it before on > the lists and realize that there is this disconnect between the developer= s > doing the actual work to implement these things and the end users. > > > > I have always been very grateful to all the developers who over the > years, and I've been a FreeBSD consumer since the late 90s? And attended = my > first usenix/freenix conf in Monterrey in 2001?, have done some really ha= rd > work on many many things in FreeBSD. For zero pay. But the thing that has > always bothered me about a lot of it is, it's just to complex to use for > most end users. Not all. But people want to get work done. Sifting throug= h > .conf files, googling howtos, spending more time configuring it than > installing it has always been an issue. Developers in general do not thin= k > like an end user. And this leads to non developers just going "screw it > I'll just get it running on Linux with my GUI installer." Which is why > FreeNas is so popular. It's taken a lot, not all, but a lot of the pain a= nd > time consuming nature of learning all the ins and outs of a NAS appliance > from the equation. > > FreeBSD have very well done man pages. I simply read them. > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 17:22:33 +0200 (CEST) > From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net> > To: Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com> > Cc: freebsd-fs <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers > <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> > Subject: Re: The small installations network filesystem and users. > Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1606281722050.8870@laptop.wojtek.intra> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DUS-ASCII; format=3Dflowed > > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but amidst discussions of pNFS (among other > > things) I thought I should bring up something someone said to me: and > that > > is (to quote him) "using NFS is too hard, I always fail." > > Never had problems with NFS. And i'm using in regularly. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:11:40 +0200 > From: Eduardo Morras <emorrasg@yahoo.es> > To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: The small installations network filesystem and users. > Message-ID: <20160628181140.933d144cd5d830275e4be6c3@yahoo.es> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1 > > On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 21:04:45 +0800 > Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On 21/06/2016 1:56 PM, Gerrit K?hn wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 22:00:31 -0400 (EDT) Daniel Eischen > > > <deischen@freebsd.org> wrote about Re: The small installations > > > network filesystem and users.: > > > > > > DE> We should support LDAP client out of the box, in base. What > > > DE> sucks now is that we need 3 packages (plus their dependencies) > > > DE> and multiple config files for ldap: > > > DE> > > > DE> pam_ldap > > > DE> nss_ldap > > > DE> openldap-client > > > > > > I only have to install/config ldap-clients every now and then, but > > > I would also strongly favour a more "integrated" setup (if that > > > requires having it in base is a different question, though). A few > > > weeks ago I used nss-pam-ldapd instead of pam_ldap and nss_ldap for > > > the first time, and it appeared to work with a bit less of a hassle > > > for me (otoh, I don't do any funky things here, I just need a > > > replacement for what we did with NIS something like 20 years ago). > > > > +1 > > I just had to reinstall certs for my server. which means copying > > certs to several places (in a default config) > > sendmail and syrus ad openssl (base) all look in different places. > > you COULD make them all look in the same place > > but that requires undersanding what is going on and not just cribbing > > the config file off the net somewhere. > > I use dhcpd to pass that configuration. On system startup, dhclient > asks to dhcpd server the ip, time-ntp, dns, and configuration for its > current job (pkgs/ports to install, apache conf, postgres conf, certs, > etc..) > depending on it's intended current use. I followed an old paper from > EuroBSDCon,... this > http://2004.eurobsdcon.org/uploads/media/EBSD04_slides_41.pdf to do the > setup. Easier and faster (at least for me) than ldap and related for > server setup. For user management, don't know, I don't have jelly > users, only daemons. > > > > > I think ports and pkg are fine, but we need to have some more thought > > put into how they all go together. > > > > --- --- > Eduardo Morras <emorrasg@yahoo.es> > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " > > ------------------------------ > > End of freebsd-hackers Digest, Vol 689, Issue 2 > *********************************************** >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJSOB_BLUkcFPPhv8UvyrK_0nDkM377mUrrU8sSdYyyqf6p87w>