Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 30 Apr 2007 09:42:42 +1000
From:      "Murray Taylor" <MTaylor@bytecraft.com.au>
To:        "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com>, "Garrett Cooper" <youshi10@u.washington.edu>, <perryh@pluto.rain.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: Is FreeBSD simple enough for Novices, Will FreeBSD accept Office 98 + Publisher?
Message-ID:  <04E232FDCD9FBE43857F7066CAD3C0F12DF2D5@svmailmel.bytecraft.internal>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Mittelstaedt [mailto:tedm@toybox.placo.com]=20
> Sent: Sunday, 29 April 2007 6:41 PM
> To: Murray Taylor; Garrett Cooper; perryh@pluto.rain.com
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: RE: Is FreeBSD simple enough for Novices,Will=20
> FreeBSD accept Office 98 + Publisher?
>=20
>=20
>=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of=20
> Murray Taylor
> > Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 7:28 PM
> > To: Garrett Cooper; perryh@pluto.rain.com
> > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Subject: RE: Is FreeBSD simple enough for Novices,Will=20
> FreeBSD accept
> > Office 98 + Publisher?
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of
> > > Garrett Cooper
> > > Sent: Sunday, 29 April 2007 4:28 AM
> > > To: perryh@pluto.rain.com
> > > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > > Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD simple enough for Novices, Will
> > > FreeBSD accept Office 98 + Publisher?
> > >
> > > perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> > > >> OpenOffice in OSX still isn't that great either because there
> > > >> still isn't a native (Aqua) build.
> > > >
> > > > I suspect the NeoOffice folks would be surprised to hear that :)
> > >
> > > Yes >_>.. I mean that the latest and greatest version of OOo isn't
> > > available for Aqua native yet. It's going to take another
> > > year to port,
> > > as someone has claimed already.
> > >
> > > There was a big leap in terms of functionality from 1.x vs
> > > 2.x in OOo,
> > > but then again considering that the OP was asking about
> > > running Office
> > > 98 (:D..), I don't think he'd mind running the 1.x=20
> version binaries.
> > >
> > > -Garrett
> >
> >
> > As the original poster wants to write books .... may I=20
> suggest that he
> > use
> > a text editor and then a typesetter combination rather than=20
> any form of
> > WYSIWYG wordprocessor.
> >
> > IE use (insert favourite text editor here) then use the=20
> LaTeX / Tetex
> > port
> > to actually properly format the material as a book.
> >
> > Yes there is a learning curve here, but the end result is all
> > over a wordprocessed attempt.
> >
>=20
> When I wrote my book Addison Wesley used Quark internally,=20
> but required
> me to submit my manuscript -on paper-.  They then retyped it, sent me
> the proofs (which had enormous numbers of typos in them) I=20
> corrected and
> sent back.
>=20
> I asked them if I gave them the manuscript in Quark source=20
> files if they
> would take that, (because I had access to a pirated copy of Quark and
> figured
> I would import what I had written my book in) and they would=20
> not.  They
> required a paper manuscript.
>=20
> Thus, use whatever you want to write your book - if your=20
> going to get it
> published most likely your publisher will not be using what=20
> your using.
>=20
> Ted
>=20
I suppose the only true response to this situation is to
note ( with / without interest ) that Luddites(*) still exist.


(*) Ludd*ite
Pronunciation: 'l&-"dIt
Function: noun
Etymology: perhaps from Ned Ludd, 18th century Leicestershire=20
=20   workman who destroyed a knitting frame
=20   : one of a group of early 19th century English workmen destroying=20
=20   laborsaving machinery as a protest;=20
broadly : one who is opposed to especially technological change=20

mjt
---------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive
use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission,
dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action
in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities
other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please inform the sender and/or
addressee immediately and delete the material.=20

E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and
may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this
e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are
given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage
caused by such matters.
---------------------------------------------------------------

### This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses by Bytecraft ###



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?04E232FDCD9FBE43857F7066CAD3C0F12DF2D5>