Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 11:55:59 +0800 From: nuzrin yaapar <nuzrin@yahoo.com> To: Nathan Mace <nmace85@yahoo.com>, freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: soft updates Message-ID: <200109170343.LAA20548@venus.cyber.mmu.edu.my> In-Reply-To: <20010916205323.7039d728.nmace85@yahoo.com> References: <20010916205323.7039d728.nmace85@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
it's very stable..i've been using it for as long as i can remember and the performance gain is significant On Monday 17 September 2001 8:53 am, Nathan Mace wrote: > i'm looking at the freebsd handbook right now, trying to decide if i should > use soft-updates on my box. i can't afford to lose any data, that is > written in stone. > > it says: "First, Soft Updates guarantees filesystem consistency in the case > of a crash..." is this true? it also lists two "problems" that might > occur using it. one would be that it 'runs' out of space if my drive is > close to being full. thats not an issue, niether is the 2nd problem > > basically what i'm asking is is it stable? and how much of a performance > gain am i gonna see? thanks > > nathan > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109170343.LAA20548>