Date: Sat, 29 May 1999 23:59:35 -0700 (PDT) From: <kip@lyris.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> Cc: Forrest Aldrich <forrie@forrie.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Pcmcia support Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.05.9905292349030.22722-100000@luna> In-Reply-To: <35774.928047146@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
That is the kind of response I like. I don't appreciate being flamed for a reasonable question about something that is not documented in an obvious place. Is it something that I can help with? Or is it more a political issue? Can you send me a pointer to something that goes into more detail? I will be upgrading to -current shortly to keep track of improvements in thread support, my interest, for better or worse, is not purely academic (read business). Even in 3.2-S unpatched libc_r had infinite recursion problems in malloc, fortunately for me, it was easy enough to hack around. On Sat, 29 May 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > Why can't the PAO changes be committed to the main source tree? It would > > be nice if I could just install the latest version of FreeBSD from > > the Walnut Creek CD-ROM as is and have PCMCIA and APM support on my > > Yes, it would be nice. To make a long story short (and emotionless) > there are integration problems which prevent this and I think that's > about as much summary information as I need to state here. > > - Jordan > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.4.05.9905292349030.22722-100000>