Date: 16 Jul 2002 11:24:39 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Jordan K Hubbard <jkh@queasyweasel.com> Cc: jos@catnook.com, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Package system flaws? Message-ID: <xzpit3g3u08.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <C7D7163F-9894-11D6-BCA3-0003938C7B7E@queasyweasel.com> References: <C7D7163F-9894-11D6-BCA3-0003938C7B7E@queasyweasel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jordan K Hubbard <jkh@queasyweasel.com> writes: > If libh ever makes it off the ground, you can bet that Tcl will enter > the base system fairly rapidly since it will be required for > everything from bootstrapping packages onto the system to actually > installing the system itself. I'm not a big fan of having Tcl in the base system, but - what are we waiting for? libh should have entered the tree a long time ago, there's absolutely nothing to be gained from leaving it out in the cold. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpit3g3u08.fsf>