Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 03:36:10 -0800 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> To: "Sasa Stupar" <sasa@stupar.homelinux.net>, <danial_thom@yahoo.com>, "Drew Tomlinson" <drew@mykitchentable.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd Theme Song) Message-ID: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNEEAOFDAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> In-Reply-To: <DFE9721AEE0E27C54C9B7741@[192.168.10.249]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>-----Original Message----- >From: Sasa Stupar [mailto:sasa@stupar.homelinux.net] >Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 12:34 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; danial_thom@yahoo.com; Drew Tomlinson >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: Polling For 100 mbps Connections? (Was Re: Freebsd >Theme Song) > >> >> Ted > >Hmmm, here is test with iperf what I have done with and without polling: >************** >------------------------------------------------------------ >Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 >TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) >------------------------------------------------------------ >[1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1088 connected with >192.168.1.200 port 5001 >[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >[1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 108 MBytes 90.1 Mbits/sec > >This is when I use Device polling option on m0n0. > >If I disable this option then my transfer is worse: >------------------------------------------------------------ >Client connecting to 192.168.1.200, TCP port 5001 >TCP window size: 8.00 KByte (default) >------------------------------------------------------------ >[1816] local 192.168.10.249 port 1086 connected with >192.168.1.200 port 5001 >[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth >[1816] 0.0-10.0 sec 69.7 MBytes 58.4 Mbits/sec >*************** > >BTW: my router is m0n0wall (FBSD 4.11). > what are the cpu speeds and operating systems of all devices in the packet path, what is the make and model of switchs in use, provide dmesg output of the bsd box, a network diagram of the setup, etc. etc. etc. The above test results are not replicatable and thus, worthless. Useful test results would allow a reader to build an exact duplicate of your setup, config it identically, and get identical results. Ted
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNEEAOFDAA.tedm>