Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 May 2009 02:49:01 +0300
From:      irix <irix@ukr.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re:altq
Message-ID:  <1676662227.20090518024901@ukr.net>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello ,

First of all,person who is responsible for this answer for my question
about  dynamics queues and finely complete to merge cdnr into pf, that
altq  nothing  else, and complete does not this function. You need and
you do. We are not interested in this.

But  altq  is  not complete solution. From altqd make any abnormality.
The  idea  of  merging  with  pf  excellent, but the realization of an
unfinished,  even  at  30%. Removed 70% of traffic disciplince's (like
blue, JoBBs), did not finish cdnr, nothing new added. How can this be called complete project?
In  DfBSD  in  altq  add fairq, is one new option in altq for last six
years.  No  development,  the  project is dead. I can understand, when
project  is complete, more it did not need to add. But altq in pf have
almost nothing. And developers say it does not concern us.

So  I  wrote  up  in maillist freebsd, as in most advanced bsd system.
Developers who think for a few years in advance. 


>  On Sat, May 16, 2009 21:45, irix wrote:
> Hello Freebsd-pf,
>
>   Sorry for my english.
>
> OpenBSD team is abandon the altq project.
>
>I just got curious about this: where you heard that OpenBSD is abandoning
>altq ?
>
>thanks,
>
>matheus
>
>--
>We will call you cygnus,
>The God of balance you shall be
>
>A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
>Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style



-- 
Best regards,
 irix                          mailto:irix@ukr.net




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1676662227.20090518024901>