Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:50:21 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: pyunyh@gmail.com Cc: Daniel Gerzo <danger@FreeBSD.org>, Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org>, stable@FreeBSD.org, yongari@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: re0 problem Message-ID: <20081021235021.87df3b16.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20081020185356.c6eb46fe.nork@FreeBSD.org> References: <755632516.20081018001504@rulez.sk> <20081018020248.GB31303@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20081020012504.95adc0ca.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20081020071155.GH38923@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20081020185356.c6eb46fe.nork@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Pyun! Sorry, I am wrong in my reported case. On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 18:53:56 +0900 Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > Hmm, that's odd. I don't think there is significant change of re(4) > > in that time window. Would you show me the revision number of > > if_re.c of old current? > Sorry, I'll try to trace the changes. I tried to build&run kernels, 20080701, 20080801, 20080815, 20080901 and 20081001. I got same result on all case. > > What I wonder is why re(4) is child device of pci3 on recent > > CURRENT whereas re(4) used to be a child device of cardbus0. Maybe > > imp@ know more details on this. There was a change in pccbb(4). > The latest current is my new note which has ExpressCard slot. > So I used&confirmed ExpressCard-to-Cardbus Bridge(TI XIO2000 > PCIe-to-PCI Bridge). takawata@ teached me that Cardbus NICs get MAC address from CIS (Card Information Structure). But my bridge is just PCIe-PCI bridge, so it doesn't have CIS.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081021235021.87df3b16.nork>