Date: Tue, 06 Apr 1999 10:09:30 -0700 From: Ted Faber <faber@ISI.EDU> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa <y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp>, Nick Sayer <nsayer@quack.kfu.com>, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Any success with CirrusLogic 6729/6730??? Message-ID: <199904061709.KAA24369@boreas.isi.edu> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 06 Apr 1999 11:03:36 MDT." <199904061703.LAA16410@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Nate Williams wrote: >> I do think that setting up the pcic code to take a port at kernel >> config time is a reasonable thing to do. > >You wouldn't get any argument from anyone, but how to do it? Making the >PCIC an ISA device is unacceptable, That was my first thought. Why is it unacceptable? (I just don't know, and it may help me come up with a better idea.) > and using an 'option' doesn't allow >the user to set it without recompiling the kernel. Well, yeah, but you can't reset an ISA device's port without doing that either, so at least it's no worse than an ISA device. But I know you don't want to add any options to the code, so that's that. - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ted Faber faber@isi.edu USC/ISI Computer Scientist http://www.isi.edu/~faber (310) 822-1511 x190 PGP Key: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkey.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNwo/yYb4eisfQ5rpAQFAKwP/aFH3IFWh/Lmpc76nc+P8N//UZVeYBybo FnCIcFT10KX8I4/8oREjuoKI3mAWafqbXi/lNBl+AZpynYDOKDzYxYz+HXZbCmfm OmGZxnlGduJW+AvQc8ahX+OrBKu9iXjovL0mmFXG5rR3xG7U18ptNw1piayI3T8V qExYnjp0oAk= =U+kA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904061709.KAA24369>