Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 18:54:48 +0200 From: Oliver Braun <obraun@FreeBSD.org> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/rsync Makefile Message-ID: <20020831165448.GB8064@informatik.unibw-muenchen.de> In-Reply-To: <20020831160049.GD8977@vega.vega.com> References: <200208310620.g7V6KQLs034255@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020831160049.GD8977@vega.vega.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> [2002/08/31 19:00 +0300]:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 11:20:26PM -0700, Oliver Braun wrote:
> > obraun 2002/08/30 23:20:26 PDT
> >
> > Modified files:
> > net/rsync Makefile
> > Log:
> > * Add knob WITH_POPT_PORT to build rsync with devel/popt.
> > * Use included popt by default.
> What is the porpose of such a change? Popt is rather small
> package, so that it should be perfectly OK to just put it
> into LIB_DEPENDS.
In PR ports/42074 the submitter was not very happy, that rsync depends
on popt and popt depends on gettext...
The included popt is as good as the devel/popt port. I totally agree
with the submitter of ports/42074, that in a server enviroment it is not
very confortable to install a lot of ports which are not _really_ needed.
I have sent the patch I have committed a few days ago to ports@ and
asked for a review resp. opinions about this change. The only reactions
I got where unexceptional *pro* this change.
Regards,
Olli
--
{- IST & IIS _ INF _ UniBwM :: obraun@informatik.unibw-muenchen.de -}
{- Tele-Consulting GmbH :: obraun@Tele-Consulting.com -}
{- FreeBSD Commmitter :: obraun@FreeBSD.org -}
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020831165448.GB8064>