Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:10:34 -0500
From:      Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        dev-null@nuxi.com
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf kmod.mk
Message-ID:  <oprwhmjwdv8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20031003.154743.112813977.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <20031003140026.5750af9e.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20031003180520.GD35274@sunbay.com> <20031003185349.GA83420@dragon.nuxi.com> <20031003.154743.112813977.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 03 Oct 2003 15:47:43 -0600 (MDT), M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> 
wrote:

> In message: <20031003185349.GA83420@dragon.nuxi.com>
>             "David O'Brien" <dev-null@nuxi.com> writes:
> : What's the use in having the build system sane (i.e., not defaulting to
> : ALWAYS_CHECK_MAKE) if you're now going to make it required??
>
> Because too many people complained when it was default.  Including
> you.  That's making it hard to know what's sensible to do...

Isn't it good to have it as default to avoid break the build? I think, 
it's good reason for us to have it as default and if someone turn it off 
then it's their fault for break the build.

Cheers,
Mezz

> Warner


-- 
bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?oprwhmjwdv8ckrg5>