Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:30:44 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Juli Mallett <juli@clockworksquid.com> Cc: "freebsd-mips@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-mips@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Enforcing soft-float. Message-ID: <7272B5EC-FDDA-4C1D-9137-6819F0906FEE@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <CACVs6=9oPR0O0M9VorxY6L7xgRn3JBQqwrJ4M4_j9ZELER7Pmg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CACVs6=9oPR0O0M9VorxY6L7xgRn3JBQqwrJ4M4_j9ZELER7Pmg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 13, 2012, at 12:42 AM, Juli Mallett wrote: > Greetings, people of mips@, >=20 > I think that at least with 64-bit kernels, MipsFPTrap should kill the > running program. Does anyone object to this? The FP code is not even > remotely 64-bit safe. I don't care/dare to correct it. Does anyone? We should kill the offending process if we get a MipsFP trap. I have = some interesting in making hard float emulation work, but I'm enotimeish = at the moment... So kill them now, and we'll not kill them in the = future if=20 Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7272B5EC-FDDA-4C1D-9137-6819F0906FEE>