Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 03:31:48 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@plains.nodak.edu>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD lang/prolog port Message-ID: <19970403033148.58584@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <199704022238.QAA03857@plains.nodak.edu> <18349.860025388@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Foo. If you're going to finally map ports/lang/prolog to something, > why not use one of the CWI or Edinburg prologs? They're much bigger Acutally we already have the Edinburgh-style Prolog in the tree as ports/lang/swi-pl. This is the second time prolog has been missed because of this name. I myself reported it and imported it as swi-prolog because I didn't notice that Max already had. Satoshi, can we move swi-pl to swi-prolog so someone else doesn't do this again? -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970403033148.58584>