Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 22:15:12 -0800 (PST) From: batie@agora.rdrop.com (Alan Batie) To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Cc: pete@sms.fi, taob@io.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Risk of having bpf0? (was URGENT: Packet sniffer found on my system) Message-ID: <m0vY4QK-0008uxC@agora.rdrop.com> In-Reply-To: <E0vXx4u-0004Y6-00@rover.village.org> from "Warner Losh" at Dec 11, 96 03:24:36 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> : functionality, like dhcpd, you need to have them. > > FWIW, rarpd also needs to have bpf enabled as well neither of these need to run on the system with shell accounts, and one could argue they're better off being on an isolated, secured, system. -- Alan Batie ______ batie@agora.rdrop.com \ / Assimilate this! +1 503 452-0960 \ / --Worf, First Contact DE 3C 29 17 C0 49 7A 27 \/ 40 A5 3C 37 4A DA 52 B9 It is my policy to avoid purchase of any products from companies which use unrequested email advertisements or telephone solicitation.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m0vY4QK-0008uxC>