Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:29:41 -0800
From:      Jason Helfman <jhelfman@e-e.com>
To:        Wesley Shields <wxs@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: More nitpicks from the department of redundancy department...
Message-ID:  <20111122172941.GA67967@dormouse.experts-exchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <20111122154924.GD56180@atarininja.org>
References:  <4EC8CC53.5000806@infracaninophile.co.uk> <CAF6rxgnHQxXBqz_R=n7HwmgTGLq0%2B_MmMwp2Si2rT%2BXHCa1i4g@mail.gmail.com> <CAF6rxgm4E%2BmjqiVxLQZJ6VPZ8OL7V=0j%2BPM9rnZpU0sPnZoLrA@mail.gmail.com> <20111122132922.GC56180@atarininja.org> <4ECBC36F.6040607@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20111122154924.GD56180@atarininja.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 10:49:24AM -0500, Wesley Shields thus spake:
>On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 03:44:47PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 22/11/2011 13:29, Wesley Shields wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:42:59AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> >> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote:
>> >>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Matthew Seaman
>> >>> <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> PORT_DBDIR?= /var/db/ports is the default setting in bsd.ports.mk -- the
>> >>>> following ports redefine it to exactly the same value:
>> >>>> [ snip ]
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks for the report - I'll handle these.
>> >>
>> >> Sorry for the empty promise. Something came up and I won't have the
>> >> time to look at these :( - maybe someone else can take them up
>> >
>> > Hi Matthew!
>> >
>> > If you could please file these in a PR and CC me I will try and work
>> > through all of these.
>>
>> Done: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=162754
>
>Thank you! I will try and clean all this up, but as I'm sure you're
>aware we are coming up on a holiday in the states so my time is limited
>for the next few days. I will look at this as time permits though!
>
>-- WXS

I did have a brief look at some of these and it was a great catch. One item
I did find interesting is a number of these define LATEST_LINK, but it just
matches ${PORTNAME}, so the LATEST_LINK can more than likely be dropped -- on
a case-by-case basis, of course.

-jgh

-- 
Jason Helfman
System Administrator
experts-exchange.com
http://www.experts-exchange.com/M_4830110.html
E4AD 7CF1 1396 27F6 79DD  4342 5E92 AD66 8C8C FBA5



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111122172941.GA67967>