Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:43:47 +0100 From: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de> To: Clifton Royston <cliftonr@lava.net> Cc: "Robin P. Blanchard" <robin.blanchard@gactr.uga.edu>, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfilter / ipnat quandry Message-ID: <3E00EC13.7060704@liwing.de> References: <EE3D3FBAFFCAED448C21C398FDAD91AC01077A@EBE1.gc.nat> <EE3D3FBAFFCAED448C21C398FDAD91AC0440C2@EBE1.gc.nat> <20021218092753.E4007@lava.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Clifton Royston wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 02:25:21PM -0500, Robin P. Blanchard wrote: > >>Well...After a bit of trial and error with my ruleset I've determined >>that commenting out the entires in the below stanza cause nmap to report >>as expected (only port 22 is open. Is this by design? The commented >>entries are directly out of the IPF faq. ??? >> >>Robin. > > > Does nmap now show all other TCP ports as "filtered" or as "closed"? > -- Clifton > Hey Guys, try to run nmap against 213.70.188.163 (helo.liwing.de), 213.70.188.162 (mail.liwing.de) and 213.70.188.164 (stingray.liwing.de). (Not you, rifter - I know you can do more!) They all have some daemons running but provide only public accessible ports outside to the public. I'm interested which ports are shown as filtered and wich as closes etc. I'll publish the rules if you want. Jens To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E00EC13.7060704>