Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Oct 2002 18:20:21 -0700
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Samuel Chow <cyschow@shaw.ca>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Bob Willcox <bob@immure.com>, dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca, Jamie Heckford <jamie@jamiesdomain.org.uk>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: sshd_config vs. PAM
Message-ID:  <20021008012021.GA34700@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <006e01c26e62$78f5f2f0$9284412f@SAMCHOW2>
References:  <200209272135.g8RLZ3We005877@arch20m.dellroad.org> <002e01c26873$3d717a50$3264a8c0@BONG> <864rc3f4ks.fsf@number6.magda.ca> <20021005155131.GA8769@luke.immure.com> <01c201c26e54$f00f54c0$9284412f@SAMCHOW2> <20021007232051.GA31301@xor.obsecurity.org> <006e01c26e62$78f5f2f0$9284412f@SAMCHOW2>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--wac7ysb48OaltWcw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 06:34:33PM -0600, Samuel Chow wrote:

> > PAM is considered to be an integral part of the system=20
> > thesedays; as such there's no support for compiling without=20
> > it.
>=20
>     I was trying to trim FreeBSD to below 16MB and to run it=20
>     as an embedded system.  I find PAM to be quite a baggage=20
>     to have for simple root ssh login and perhaps ssh=20
>     tunnelling.

The ssh-picobsd port exists for this purpose.

Kris

--wac7ysb48OaltWcw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE9ojLUWry0BWjoQKURAjxuAKCy7lTct8jYS01YF3pi/AZFt5WMVwCcDjrJ
JGC+a9m+FD5nxB8PjAq7UII=
=klKf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wac7ysb48OaltWcw--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021008012021.GA34700>