Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 10:40:19 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: pst@shockwave.com, scrappy@ki.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ether_sprintf bug: possible patch? Message-ID: <2333.822649219@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 Jan 1996 16:00:31 %2B1100." <199601260500.QAA19967@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >no, just re sup and you should be ok, that patch takes us backwards, %D isn' t > >used anumore as far as I recall... > > Re sup in a day or two. %D is too new to be used in all cases where it > should be, and ether_sprintf() went away while it was still used. Sorry for this mess, I lost a patch file on the way. It should be OK now. Paul: %D is for hexdumping things, see the comments in subr_prf.c -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2333.822649219>