Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Jan 2001 13:58:57 -0600
From:      David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>
To:        Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>
Cc:        Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>, Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: too much confusion over kernel building
Message-ID:  <20010118135857.A11345@grumpy.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <200101180744.UAA14563@ducky.nz.freebsd.org>; from dan@langille.org on Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 08:44:22PM %2B1300
References:  <20010118022343.A7286@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com>; <20010118094123.B6927@rapier.smartspace.co.za> <200101180744.UAA14563@ducky.nz.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 08:44:22PM +1300, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 18 Jan 2001, at 9:41, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
> 
> > Who exactly is advocating a full buildworld?  The "new" style should not
> > require a full buildworld.  If it doesn't work, it's a bug.
> 
> The handbook does.  Well, it doesn't, but the frequently interpretion is 
> just that.  And my patch aims to fix that common misinterpretation.  
> Amongst other things.

In all the bulk on this topic I missed the details as to whether
Dan's xeon may have an old buildworld, no buildworld, or up to date
buildworld laying around.

--
David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net
=====================================================================
The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its
capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010118135857.A11345>