Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:48:34 -0600 From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: "Juha Saarinen" <juha@saarinen.org> Cc: "'Andrew Reilly'" <areilly@bigpond.net.au>, "'Joe Abley'" <jabley@automagic.org>, <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: 127/8 continued Message-ID: <15279.36370.255717.249074@nomad.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <00e001c144c8$c33bf900$0a01a8c0@den2> References: <20010924160936.A10863@gurney.reilly.home> <00e001c144c8$c33bf900$0a01a8c0@den2>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> :: Those packets are _supposed_ to get back to this host. That's > :: what loopback is for. > > Yes, I think the RFCs make a point of this. But if you have no interface listening on the other 254 addresses, you may was well blockhole them. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15279.36370.255717.249074>