Date: Tue, 06 Apr 1999 10:25:22 -0700 From: Ted Faber <faber@ISI.EDU> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa <y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp>, Nick Sayer <nsayer@quack.kfu.com>, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Any success with CirrusLogic 6729/6730??? Message-ID: <199904061725.KAA25490@boreas.isi.edu> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 06 Apr 1999 11:11:29 MDT." <199904061711.LAA16507@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Nate Williams wrote: >> That was my first thought. Why is it unacceptable? (I just don't >> know, and it may help me come up with a better idea.) > >Because as you can tell, the PCIC code is *NOT* ISA specific. It's >ISA-like, but not ISA specific. The code has no ISA code in it, except >to deal with ISA devices (if it does, it should be removed). Point made. I see a sysctl variable (I think) in the probe routine used to allow the suer to select the management irq. How about adding one or more to select the IO ports for the controller? - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ted Faber faber@isi.edu USC/ISI Computer Scientist http://www.isi.edu/~faber (310) 822-1511 x190 PGP Key: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkey.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNwpDgYb4eisfQ5rpAQECegQAhCR0yflIA6400/fkOvlie8eTchgl097A IkUSPk3CUb8xYmbsONGnSH1W+dVKDgIYmJ9cPkLnnDEoZzW8Mcxp19Ue9XX0UcPP mC9F7/xpuw9eapDfKK6hHpOTadydGN2n1cHgvLZnJ2QDeUfVPj/HBynwALOOIvQK 4qxaFyfZkaQ= =BQdS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904061725.KAA25490>