Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:50:20 -0400 From: Joe Abley <jabley@automagic.org> To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> Cc: Juha Saarinen <juha@saarinen.org>, 'Andrew Reilly' <areilly@bigpond.net.au>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 127/8 continued Message-ID: <20010924155020.O37693@buffoon.automagic.org> In-Reply-To: <15279.36370.255717.249074@nomad.yogotech.com> References: <20010924160936.A10863@gurney.reilly.home> <00e001c144c8$c33bf900$0a01a8c0@den2> <15279.36370.255717.249074@nomad.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 01:48:34PM -0600, Nate Williams wrote: > > :: Those packets are _supposed_ to get back to this host. That's > > :: what loopback is for. > > > > Yes, I think the RFCs make a point of this. > > But if you have no interface listening on the other 254 addresses, you > may was well blockhole them. s/254/16777216/ :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010924155020.O37693>