Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 21:39:38 +0100 From: Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl> To: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, shigeaki@se.hiroshima-u.ac.jp, Rink Springer <rink@stack.nl> Subject: Re: icsphy(4) for nfe(4) - better Microsoft Xbox support Message-ID: <20070207203938.GE27282@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <20070207003756.GA37911@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20070206204314.GB27282@hoeg.nl> <20070207003756.GA37911@cdnetworks.co.kr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--2NVUe83uzBILE3UT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, * Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> wrote: > Would you try overhauled nfe(4)? >=20 > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/nfe/if_nfe.c > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/nfe/if_nfereg.c > http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/nfe/if_nfevar.c >=20 > The new nfe(4) should perform better than nve(4) or stock nfe(4). > I'm still not satisfied with its excessive generation of interrtups > but it's better than stock nfe(4). After switching to adaptive > polling I saw noticeable performance boost. If you find any issues > please let me know. I just compiled and installed a kernel with the new nfe(4) driver and DEVICE_POLLING enabled. Below are the results of some scp(1) transfers: stock nfe(4): 2.5 MB/sec new nfe(4): 3.7 MB/sec polling: 4.1 MB/sec The driver is a lot better than the stock nfe(4). Are there any plans to add the new nfe(4) to the sourcetree? --=20 Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl> WWW: http://g-rave.nl/ --2NVUe83uzBILE3UT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFyjkK52SDGA2eCwURAlT0AJ9LWV5b+UVsW2xp758lmZbyCWw6QACeKFCz vi5CPVWyTdWKuMGv6a+tFLs= =sUXL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2NVUe83uzBILE3UT--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070207203938.GE27282>