Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Jul 2001 22:01:31 +0100
From:      Richard Smith <rdls@satamatics.com>
To:        Marcus Obst <mobst@apfel.sax.de>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: close on non-blocking socket
Message-ID:  <20010719220131.A1027@gaia.home.rdls.net>
In-Reply-To: <20010719183130.A7106@apfel.sax.de>; from mobst@apfel.sax.de on Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 06:31:30PM %2B0200
References:  <20010719183130.A7106@apfel.sax.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 06:31:30PM +0200, Marcus Obst wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am in doubt about the following;
> what happens when a non-blocking socket that still has pending outgoing
> data is closed?  In my network book (by R. Stevens) I read that TCP will
> try to flush the data already queued in the output buffer.  But in the
> FreeBSD man page of close I got:
> 
>   on the last close of a socket(2) associated naming information and
>   queued data are discarded
>   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> What's right ...?

The behaviour of close(2) in this case, is modified by SO_LINGER (see getsockopt(2)).

Richard.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010719220131.A1027>