Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 29 Jan 2005 18:35:21 +0300
From:      Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su>
To:        Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru>
Cc:        Will Andrews <will@csociety.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/em if_em.c
Message-ID:  <20050129153520.GA84137@comp.chem.msu.su>
In-Reply-To: <41F7E9B6.9000205@cronyx.ru>
References:  <200501261344.j0QDimuk043970@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050126155731.GV73953@hex.databits.net> <20050126172748.GA94020@comp.chem.msu.su> <41F7E9B6.9000205@cronyx.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 10:04:22PM +0300, Roman Kurakin wrote:
> Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 09:57:31AM -0600, Will Andrews wrote:
> > 
> >
> >>On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:44:48PM +0000, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> >>   
> >>
> >>> This change might look orthogonal to rev#1.85, but in fact
> >>>     
> >>>
> >>					     ^^^^
> >>
> >>   
> >>
> >>> message of rev#1.85 easier.
> >>>     
> >>>
> >>		   ^^^^
> >>
> >>   
> >>
> >>> Revision  Changes    Path
> >>> 1.59      +18 -5     src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c
> >>>     
> >>>
> >>I guess this means you have a time machine?
> >>   
> >>
> >
> >No, it was just a race between my fingers.  No mutex locking, you see ;-P
> >I meant rev#1.58 of course.  I wonder if it's worth doing a forced commit
> >of errata...
> > 
> >
> Only if you expect that someone would search for 1.58 phrase.

After a bit of consideration I decided that having a wrong reference
to an earlier revision is like setting a bogus pointer for someone
to dereference and get nuked, which is a bad thing.  I hope nobody
will mind my forced errata commit :-)

-- 
Yar



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050129153520.GA84137>