Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:56:37 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> To: imp@bsdimp.com Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why do we have @ in modules builds? Message-ID: <201411032056.sA3KubAk006298@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <3285BC54-05D8-41DB-88FE-BAD681A3E45B@bsdimp.com> References: <3285BC54-05D8-41DB-88FE-BAD681A3E45B@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <3285BC54-05D8-41DB-88FE-BAD681A3E45B@bsdimp.com>, Warner Losh writes: >Does anybody recall why we have @ symlink in our module builds? Back in the mists of ancient time, it was a way to allow easy relocation of kernel builds -- that way, there was only one symlink to change rather than two (or perhaps even more). I'm reasonably convinced it's my fault, anyway. Forgive me: I was still young then. -GAWollman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201411032056.sA3KubAk006298>