Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      21 Feb 2003 11:42:05 -0800
From:      Justin Hopper <jhopper@spry.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Cvsup Handbook Example
Message-ID:  <1045856524.23001.515.camel@home.gusalmighty.com>
In-Reply-To: <1045854810.22986.479.camel@home.gusalmighty.com>
References:  <20030221151412.D867B43FBF@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <1045854810.22986.479.camel@home.gusalmighty.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry, this of course should have read 'after 665 and before 667'.

On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 11:13, Justin Hopper wrote:
> Hello unamed person,
> 
> For the rest of the world that doesn't follow Christian Mythology, 666
> is just the number after 667 and before 665.  I've used 666 in several
> coding examples, usually for client/server socket daemons, as most
> people don't have anything using port 666.
> 
> Would you rather that the good people of FreeBSD be barred from using
> particular numbers?  This could pose a problem.
-- 
Justin Hopper
jhopper@spry.com
UNIX Systems Engineer
http://www.spry.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1045856524.23001.515.camel>