Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:04:01 +0100
From:      Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
To:        David.E.Tweten@nasa.gov
Cc:        dbm@5fm.za.com
Subject:   Re: Stable vs Release vs Current
Message-ID:  <20040219190401.4ed3ac9a.steve@sohara.org>
In-Reply-To: <3748.1077147369@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov>
References:  <3748.1077147369@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:36:09 -0800
Dave Tweten <tweten@nas.nasa.gov> wrote:

DT> tag=RELENG_5 --> This is how to get cvsup to give you the absolutely 
DT> latest, up-to-the-minute, flakiest CURRENT.

	This one (and only this one) is wrong - tag=RELENG_5 will currently
empty your source tree. Soon (hopefully) it will produce 5-STABLE and current
will be labelled 6.x - at that point there will be *two* active stable
branches - the older one may be more stable and the newer will be more
featurefull, eventually the older one will have no advantages and will
die off.

	Oh yes - the one for the latest, up-to-the-minute, flakiest* CURRENT
is tag=. the same as you always need for the ports.

* probably not the flakiest - for that you probably want tag=ALPHA_2_0 :)

-- 
C:>WIN                                      |     Directable Mirrors
The computer obeys and wins.                |A Better Way To Focus The Sun
You lose and Bill collects.                 |  licenses available - see:
                                            |   http://www.sohara.org/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040219190401.4ed3ac9a.steve>