Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 08:27:42 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Koop Mast <kwm@rainbow-runner.nl> Cc: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Intel GPU driver import Message-ID: <4FB5DDCE.5060108@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120517212648.GV2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20120512213950.GZ2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20120517112315.GR2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <4FB52FF6.9040803@rainbow-runner.nl> <4FB55E56.3020403@FreeBSD.org> <20120517212648.GV2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 18/05/2012 00:26 Konstantin Belousov said the following: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:23:50PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 17/05/2012 20:05 Koop Mast said the following: >>> I updated the xf86-video-intel driver in xorg-dev to support the >>> situation with this new patch, it now only supports the 15.0 patch or >>> current after this is committed. >>> >>> For people trying the 15.0 patch with regular ports a patch is >>> available here: >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~kwm/intel-video-i915kms.diff >> >> Koop, >> >> IMO it's better to try i915 first and then i915kms if that fails. > > Both i915 and i195kms are present in the system. Your proposal guarantees > that DRI1 driver is always loaded, making new ddx non-operational. > > It might make sense to try i915 if i915kms failed to load, only to hope to > support (far) future systems where i915kms is renamed back to i915. I would > not bother now. Ah, right, my proposal doesn't make any sense then. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FB5DDCE.5060108>