Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 19:20:01 -0800 (PST) From: Peter Schultz <peter@jocose.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/34908: libpng port makes bad dynamic library on -CURRENT Message-ID: <200202170320.g1H3K1F17696@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/34908; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Peter Schultz <peter@jocose.org> To: "Alexander N. Kabaev" <ak03@gte.com> Cc: Bjoern Fischer <bfischer@Techfak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, vova@sw.ru, David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: ports/34908: libpng port makes bad dynamic library on -CURRENT Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 21:15:51 -0600 Alexander N. Kabaev wrote: >> Interesting. Is the DF_TEXTREL flag set in DT_FLAGS instead? Is the >> library linked w/ -enable-new-dtags? Are the new dtags enabled by >> default in the new binutils? Someting in elf32.em? > > No. DT_FLAGS entry is not created regardless of whether the > --enable-new-dtags parameter has been passed to the linker. Ld simply > ignores dynamic relocation entries for local symbols while checking > whether either DT_FLAGS or DT_TEXTREL should be created. Attached patch > appears to fix the problem for me and has not caused any problems on my > test box so far but I am not making any claims about its correctness. > Use on your own risk. > It's got to be at least partially correct because this patch does indeed work. I've been punishing my machine and it's doing great! Thank you, Alexander, and all. Pete... >> Are the new dtags enabled by default in the new binutils? > > No, it seems like the new dtags are disabled by default. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200202170320.g1H3K1F17696>