Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 10:50:22 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? Message-ID: <200106061650.f56GoMl00438@billy-club.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 05 Jun 2001 18:33:17 %2B0200." <70325.991758797@critter> References: <70325.991758797@critter>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <70325.991758797@critter> Poul-Henning Kamp writes: : In message <20010605013148.A49246@dragon.nuxi.com>, "David O'Brien" writes: : >On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 07:46:18PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: : >> Is there any reason not to MFC the new md(4) functionality : > : >Zero reason not to. : : Others see it differently, it would seriously break a lot of : people who are using -stable in embedded applications. : : If we have abandoned the "no changes to API or ABI in -stable" : paradigm, it would be a good idea, but it serious rains on that : rule... I've stated in the past that removing mfs from stable is going to cause me some grief. However, the addition of md won't so long as mfs remains intact. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200106061650.f56GoMl00438>