Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 Oct 2011 20:53:27 +0200 (CEST)
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no>
To:        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Does anyone use nscd?
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1110042050500.18373@mail.fig.ol.no>
In-Reply-To: <86obxw4s4w.fsf@ds4.des.no>
References:  <86sjn84wco.fsf@ds4.des.no> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1110041800290.18373@mail.fig.ol.no> <86obxw4s4w.fsf@ds4.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--2055831798-642281578-1317754407=:18373
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT

On Tue, 4 Oct 2011 18:51+0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:

> Trond Endrestøl <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no> writes:
> > It's in daily use at Gjøvik Technical College (Fagskolen i Gjøvik), 
> > here in Norway. Both the mail and web servers authenticates our users 
> > by LDAP, and nscd certainly speeds up the lookups.
> 
> OK.  No trouble with clients dying of SIGPIPE?  I could never reproduce
> the bug, but both users who reported problems used ldap, and I don't
> have an LDAP server to test against, so I thought it might be specific
> to LDAP.

Not in my (somewhat limited) experience.


Trond.

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trond Endrestøl                  | Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no
ACM, NAS, NUUG, SAGE, USENIX     |    FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE & Alpine 2.00
--2055831798-642281578-1317754407=:18373--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1110042050500.18373>