Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 7 Jul 1999 22:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Tani Hosokawa <unknown@riverstyx.net>
To:        David Scheidt <dscheidt@enteract.com>
Cc:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>, Yann Ramin <atrus@matadore.montereyhigh.com>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: IA64
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907072234030.14425-100000@avarice.riverstyx.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96.990707213420.27433B-100000@shell-2.enteract.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, David Scheidt wrote:

> >  >The documentation HP and Intel released last month didn't include 
> > >documentation about supervisor mode operation.  Unless they have since, 
> > >it would be difficult to do any real work at a kernel port.  
> > 
> > It's relatively easy for serious developers to get the information
> > from Intel -- under NDA at first, and for publication by the time
> > anyone can lay hands on a real processor.
> 
> Signing an NDA to work on source availabe system is silly, unless of course
> Intel will let you out of it when the make documentation available to 
> the general public.  I haven't looked into it, so I can't say anything more.

Not to sound rude or anything, but don't you think permanently withholding
development information for their processor would be pretty damn stupid?

---
tani hosokawa
river styx internet




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.10.9907072234030.14425-100000>