Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 11:20:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/54293: [patch][non-maintainer] add identification to postgresql72 configuration dialog Message-ID: <200307111820.h6BIKDv0056596@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/54293; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org> To: FreeBSD Gnats Submit <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Subject: Re: ports/54293: [patch][non-maintainer] add identification to postgresql72 configuration dialog Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 19:14:54 +0100 Adding to audit trail, from misfiled PR ports/54307: Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 09:14:22 +0200 From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net> Message-Id: <17670000.1057821262@palle.girgensohn.se> References: <200307092351.h69Np5Il096982@lonesome.lonesome.com> Hi, I guess there's no harm in adding these labels, it is a good idea, though I advice you to consider using postgresql7 instead. The only reason to get the older postgresql72 installed via portupgrade is to set WITH_POSTGRES72=YES and building something that depends on libgda2. If you manually decide to use postgresl72, perhaps one can expect that the user has used that port before and that he/she would recognize it? Perhaps not. The patch is OK with me - as I said, its a good idea. :) /Palle / maintainer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200307111820.h6BIKDv0056596>