Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 15:48:08 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Karl Denninger <tickerguydenninger@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Two odd problems with STABLE-10 r262921 Message-ID: <531F6878.1070909@sentex.net> In-Reply-To: <CAHCMRk88Zzgi7G74-Lp0QXHaJZcYXh=LRUE3wGQg1Z7ObTFJgg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAHCMRk_=s%2B2LYr-pLkt7LJK3LcWSiomtLb_HhfUrj4VMUHjQVQ@mail.gmail.com> <20140311155948.GR32089@funkthat.com> <CAHCMRk8VM-kyH6JO9t_v8V8=nBAzCiJO-4_AzMPmcWhQTUwHdw@mail.gmail.com> <531F606D.1030203@sentex.net> <CAHCMRk-HsiRsqETa40esJDq7zbj1HLqzh-9qYYOfZcCrje4d7Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHCMRk9ahoe=fHAcQWW9O5idg1KvQPBqiM2p3t6F8zQWe4TELw@mail.gmail.com> <531F6385.7020209@sentex.net> <CAHCMRk88Zzgi7G74-Lp0QXHaJZcYXh=LRUE3wGQg1Z7ObTFJgg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/11/2014 3:30 PM, Karl Denninger wrote: > Hmmm.. ok, that worked, which implies there's a problem in the ipfw code > -- does the pf patch address ipfw as well? I think the patch is pf specific. I dont use ipfw in a stateful way. Perhaps its just an issue of increase its equiv of the state table ? Not sure. Maybe post a sanitized version of your ruleset here to start ---Mike -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada http://www.tancsa.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?531F6878.1070909>