Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 13:23:06 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: "Conrad J. Sabatier" <conrads@cox.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "portmaster -o" behaves a little strangely (IMHO) Message-ID: <4F1F213A.9030206@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120124151845.31ed1fd3@cox.net> References: <20120124081905.5f497763@cox.net> <4F1F153A.50004@FreeBSD.org> <20120124151845.31ed1fd3@cox.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/24/2012 13:18, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > Yes, using origin designators in both places worked. Is this an > unwritten requirement in the case of the -o option? No, usually it works with the package name as the second argument (or even a glob pattern as long as it resolves to a unique package name). Like I said, the way that the ports framework handles gcc seems to do things that confuse portmaster. I'm not saying that it's doing anything wrong, it's just different. Doug -- It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short. Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F1F213A.9030206>