Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:06:11 -0500 From: Bart Silverstrim <bsilver@chrononomicon.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Uptime? Message-ID: <BCB00374-5FE3-11D9-AF88-000D932C89A2@chrononomicon.com> In-Reply-To: <41DCB3C4.1070203@vilot.com> References: <20050105193119.A29486@logik.ath.cx> <41DCB3C4.1070203@vilot.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 5, 2005, at 10:43 PM, Tom Vilot wrote: > Mark wrote: > >> So, we know BSD is capable of stupidly high uptime, but what >> I'd like to know is how? I mean, we all have to patch things >> now and again, recompile kernels etc. Does this mean these >> sites are running thousand-day-old unpatched kernels,... >> > > Yep!! (AFAIK) Clusters that lie about uptimes because machine A goes down but machine B still is up? It's how I thought Windows was ever on that list... :-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BCB00374-5FE3-11D9-AF88-000D932C89A2>