Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 09:26:17 -0500 From: Julio Merino <jmmv@freebsd.org> To: "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org> Subject: Should we MFC tests into stable/10? Message-ID: <CAFY7cWCVx4twoaphPnRriYvRAY%2BKHHG3hDMGTJiD=xdeT25feg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello all, Keeping the testing infrastructure in sync between current and stable/10 is, in my opinion, a worthy goal. For that reason, I have (finally) pulled up a bunch of related pending changes into the branch today and will continue to do so for upcoming improvements. However, I would like to gather your opinion on what to do about the tests themselves. Do you think it's worth keeping the tests between current and stable/10 in sync wherever possible? Because we have barely just started adding tests, this will certainly involve quite a bit of churn in MFCs -- but that's probably not a big deal. The tricky^Winteresting cases will come when tests start failing in only one of the two branches :-P My opinion is now leaning towards merging everything where it makes sense. What's yours? Thanks, -- Julio Merino
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFY7cWCVx4twoaphPnRriYvRAY%2BKHHG3hDMGTJiD=xdeT25feg>