Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 8 Apr 2000 02:32:30 -0300
From:      lioux@uol.com.br
To:        Kent Stewart <kstewart@3-cities.com>
Cc:        Bush Doctor <dervish@goku.cl.msu.edu>, FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, "David J. Kanter" <djkanter@nwu.edu>, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: ports/devel/codecrusader Makefile Fixes
Message-ID:  <20000408023230.A346@Fedaykin.here>
In-Reply-To: <38EE5DB0.4C9F3668@3-cities.com>; from kstewart@3-cities.com on Fri, Apr 07, 2000 at 03:14:08PM -0700
References:  <200004041002.DAA09557@freefall.freebsd.org> <38EBBDE2.47FF5BF2@3-cities.com> <20000405223501.B86568@ikhala.tcimet.net> <38EBF298.1B051729@3-cities.com> <20000405235751.A86786@ikhala.tcimet.net> <38EC1472.28B209C7@3-cities.com> <20000406170029.B98981@goku.cl.msu.edu> <38EE5DB0.4C9F3668@3-cities.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Here is what I have had to do to make Code Crusader 1.5.3 build as a
> port.

Well, can I package your insights and send in a patch till sunday? Is
that okay with you?

However, I am trying a different approach. I am building separate
ports for the latest ACE and JX. Besides, I am considering writing
additional ports for each lib written with the jx x11-toolkits, if
that can be acomplished.

This way I will be able to keep the latest libraries available without
touching codecrusader. Furthermore, this will enable other JX and ACE
dependent ports to be easily built. This might get done real soon if
everybody keeps working this fast. :)

--
regards, mferreira


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000408023230.A346>