Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 06:20:35 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Eric Badger <eric@badgerio.us> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Early use of log() does not end up in kernel msg buffer Message-ID: <71705.1428387635@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <552326A2.5000406@badgerio.us> References: <5514CC6D.3020607@badgerio.us> <2033248.Eu3RHS8lTG@ralph.baldwin.cx> <70135.1428354681@critter.freebsd.dk> <552326A2.5000406@badgerio.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- In message <552326A2.5000406@badgerio.us>, Eric Badger writes: >> The reason was systems not running syslog having slow serial consoles. > >Correct me if I've misunderstood, but that doesn't seem to matter here; >the proposed change adds logging to the message buffer but leaves >logging to the console (when no syslog is listening) unchanged. Sorry, I must have misunderstood the question then. I don't think I have any opinion on the log() function. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?71705.1428387635>