Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 15:51:09 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/fetchmail Makefile Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971027154847.530C-100000@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <199710271146.WAA04996@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 27 Oct 1997, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > * ${INSTALL} -> install
> > * because install -C -d fails
> >
> >Um, ${INSTALL} is defined to be "install" in sys.mk. I don't think
> >this should change anything.
>
> It is user-configurable in /etc/make.conf. I use flags -C -D -D -p.
I use -C, why it is fails for me.
> Why does -d fail? In late-2.1, it meant the same as -D does now.
> Now it means to create intermediate directories. Both cases should be
> harmless if -d with its new meaning is not required.
Maybe install bug. The code disallows -d with compare. If we agree that it
is install bug, fix is obvious.
--
Andrey A. Chernov
<ache@nietzsche.net>
http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.971027154847.530C-100000>