Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 11:34:04 -0700 From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org, ambrisko@tcsi.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/socks5 - Imported sources Message-ID: <199604241834.LAA08290@precipice.shockwave.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 24 Apr 1996 10:07:15 PDT." <199604241707.KAA24400@austin.polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Why didn't you use Doug Ambrisko's port? He uploaded it to incoming and
> announced it in -ports on April 5th. He also mentioned it just a couple
> days ago in -current, I believe.
> --
> John Polstra jdp@polstra.com
> John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA
> "Self-knowledge is always bad news." -- John Barth
Because I get about 350 messages a day and they slipped through the cracks.
I'll go look at Doug's code...(time passes) I just looked things over, and
there's no difference between Doug's port and mine, other than the default
for my port has all files installed in the ${PREFIX} tree and his follows
the NEC default of stuffing stuff in /etc.
Given that it's trivial to change this, and Doug is now listed as the official
maintainer of the port, I'll let him decide which is proper behavior (but
I think proper behavior is to store configs in /usr/local/etc, not /etc, as
that's where port config files are supposed to go.)
Paul
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604241834.LAA08290>