Date: 13 Sep 1998 03:01:34 +0200 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Co=EFdan?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) To: Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sshd Message-ID: <xzpbtokesgh.fsf@hvergelmir.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Roger Marquis's message of "Fri, 11 Sep 1998 20:16:08 -0700 (PDT)" References: <Pine.SUN.3.96.980911195617.10501D-100000@roble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> writes: > The recommended sshd startup method used to be /etc/rc*(/*), probably > for historical reasons. It may still be a good idea on slow CPUs, > where it can take a while to generate a session key, or where > inetd.conf isn't running, however, in my experience, sshd is much more > reliably run from inetd. "Much more reliable"? What's more reliable than 100%? Have you ever experienced any problems running sshd from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/? I haven't, and *all* boxes I control rely entirely on ssh for remote access, and have inetd disabled. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - dag-erli@ifi.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpbtokesgh.fsf>