Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 12:17:00 -0400 (EDT) From: "James A. Mutter" <jmutter@netwalk.com> To: John Reynolds~ <jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com> Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Mindcruft ... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9905051214150.298-100000@insomnia.local.net> In-Reply-To: <14128.25013.222841.381373@hip186.ch.intel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, someone asked this a few days ago and the general response was that Mindcraft's reputation was rather tainted at the moment. It would be nice though to see a test, formal or informal, of FreeBSD 3.X, Linux (Whatever is the latest stable kernel), and NT 4.0 all tuned by a professional on the same hardware, same situation, etc... Generally, a fair test on a level playing field. On Wed, 5 May 1999, John Reynolds~ wrote: : :I wonder how we could get in on this fun ... : : http://www.mindcraft.com/openbenchmark.html : :I'm sure that 3.1-STABLE or some other variant could compete quite well at :this little game ... : :-Jr : :-- :=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= :| John Reynolds CEG, CCE, Next Generation Flows, HLA | :| Intel Corporation MS: CH6-210 Phone: 480-554-9092 pgr: 868-6512 | :| jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/ | :=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= : : :To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org :with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message : : To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9905051214150.298-100000>